human and no human

When the people talk about to looking after the environment, I wonder how do they look after the environment? The people think that recycling and reusing the resource they are looking after the environment. But I wonder How does get the paper to their books and/or notebook? How does the meat get on their plate? How does get the clothes to their body? Those get for the animals and vegetables...And I wonder the animals and vegetables are not part of green environment? I think that the relation between human and no human says us something important. To begin to understanding that our belief about we are over the animals and vegetables is a cultural construction. In other word, thinking controlling the animals, vegetables and other no human is a cultural construction and cultural principle that doesn't make us fine. Thinking that it is better to us shutting up animals in an artificial corral with a lots of other animals does not make us fine. Injecting hormone for accelerating the growth of animals or/and exploiting the ground exhausting its soil, does not make us fine. And this, at to be in our cultural principles, is in our practices and symbolization.
At least I have rethought the relation human and 'no human', understanding it as a relation asymmetric-changing, where sometimes I will depend of an animal, and sometimes the animal will depend of me, and sometimes the animal and me depend of climate or climate depend of both, nobody control to other.